(SeaPRwire) – Presiden Trump baru saja mengeluarkan perintah eksekutif yang bertujuan untuk mengurangi biaya perumahan dengan mengimpos larangan pemerintah pada perusahaan equity swasta dan investor institusionil untuk berpartisipasi di pasar rumah tipe tunggal. Bukan hanya overreach yang diusulkan ini mengganggu kekuatan pasar yang ingin mendorong investasi lebih banyak dalam perumahan dan meningkatkan penawaran, tetapi hal ini akan sedikit membantu meningkatkan ketersediaan perumahan.
Ini adalah contoh sempurna dari kata bijak: jangan hanya melakukan sesuatu; diam saja. Penyewa akan lebih baik tanpa usulan ini.
Saat ini, hanya beberapa yang dimiliki oleh investor institusionil. Memaksa investor-investor itu untuk menjual, atau menghalangi investor baru dari memasuki pasar, akan sedikit membantu menurunkan harga. Faktanya, investasi dalam perumahan membantu meningkatkan penawaran. Ketika Anda memotong investasi, Anda mendapatkan konstruksi yang lebih sedikit dan rumah yang lebih sedikit. Ketika penawaran turun, harga naik. Itu cukup sederhana.
Trump menyatakan, “Orang hidup di rumah, bukan perusahaan.” Tepat sekali. Tetapi poin utama dari memiliki investasi dalam perumahan adalah agar investor dapat menyewakan rumah tersebut, sehingga hanya “orang yang hidup di rumah investasi tersebut, bukan perusahaan.”
Selain itu, hanya “orang” yang berinvestasi dalam perusahaan investasi, jadi mengapa pemerintah mengecualikan kelompok orang yang besar dari berinvestasi lebih banyak di pasar perumahan? Melarang investor institusionil atau perusahaan equity swasta dari berinvestasi dalam perumahan sama pentingnya dengan melarang investor institusionil atau perusahaan equity swasta dari berinvestasi dalam saham.
Perhatikan analogi ini dari kepemilikan fraksional, dan seringkali institusionil, perusahaan (yaitu, pasar saham): Jika saya ingin berinvestasi dalam teknologi tinggi, saya dapat datang ke Silicon Valley untuk membeli sepenuhnya perusahaan, tetapi satu-satunya masalahnya adalah saya tidak memiliki triliun dolar yang tersedia. Bahkan jika saya dapat mengafford-nya, saya tidak ingin membeli seluruh perusahaan kecil.
Instead, stock markets allow millions of people like me to invest small amounts of money to own a small fraction of a company. I can buy just one share through my stockbroker or even through a mutual or index fund that holds small pieces of many companies. Private equity brings many investors and even the richest investor Elon Musk needed to use private equity when he led a team of investors to purchase .
Instead, stock markets allow millions of people like me to invest small amounts of money to own a small fraction of a company. I can buy just one share through my stockbroker or even through a mutual or index fund that holds small pieces of many companies. Private equity brings many investors and even the richest investor Elon Musk needed to use private equity when he led a team of investors to purchase Tesla.
Private equity and institutional investments are simply a set of tools and ownership structures that people use to expand investments. Private equity and institutional investments also make , and that is good for everyone.
Private equity and institutional investments are simply a set of tools and ownership structures that people use to expand investments. Private equity and institutional investments also make capital, liquidity, and efficiency that is good for everyone.
The same holds true for real estate, and we should be encouraging more investment in the real estate industry not less.
The same holds true for real estate, and we should be encouraging more investment in the real estate industry not less.
Economists recognize that at present many zoning laws interfere with the supply of housing and that drives prices more than where they should be. Another set of problems arises with Mamdani-style price controls on housing that encourage landlords to invest less in their housing and sometimes even abandon their housing. But the solution is to , not to reduce investments in housing.
Economists recognize that at present many zoning laws interfere with the supply of housing and that drives prices more than where they should be. Another set of problems arises with Mamdani-style price controls on housing that encourage landlords to invest less in their housing and sometimes even abandon their housing. But the solution is to reform zoning laws, not to reduce investments in housing.
I personally have benefited from private equity firms investing in housing on more than one occasion. When I moved to Hartford 18 years ago, I did not want to pony up a few hundred thousand dollars for a home when I was unsure where I wanted to live. Instead, I had the benefit of interacting with a Boston-based private equity firm that had gathered institutional money and built the tallest residential building in Connecticut. All I had to do was show up with one month’s rent deposit.
I personally have benefited from private equity firms investing in housing on more than one occasion. When I moved to Hartford 18 years ago, I did not want to pony up a few hundred thousand dollars for a home when I was unsure where I wanted to live. Instead, I had the benefit of interacting with a Boston-based private equity firm that had gathered institutional money and built the tallest residential building in Connecticut. All I had to do was show up with one month’s rent deposit.
I was always grateful for that private equity firm, and at the beginning of each month I would write them a thank you card in the form of my rent. I, paying customer, benefited them and the private equity funded landlord who fronted all of the costs benefited me. Denying the idea that investments can be mutually beneficial for investors and consumers is entering Mamdani territory.
I was always grateful for that private equity firm, and at the beginning of each month I would write them a thank you card in the form of my rent. I, paying customer, benefited them and the private equity funded landlord who fronted all of the costs benefited me. Denying the idea that investments can be mutually beneficial for investors and consumers is entering Mamdani territory.
Would Trump retroactively apply this new ban on institutional investments to the residential projects he worked on in the past? I imagine that at least some, but more likely most, of Trump led real estate projects involved him lining up investors including institutional ones to pay for the costs up front and ideally get compensated with profits later. That’s the American way.
Would Trump retroactively apply this new ban on institutional investments to the residential projects he worked on in the past? I imagine that at least some, but more likely most, of Trump led real estate projects involved him lining up investors including institutional ones to pay for the costs up front and ideally get compensated with profits later. That’s the American way.
Orang yang tinggal di apartemen, multi-familia, atau rumah tipe tunggal yang dimungkinkan oleh investor institusionil dan dana real estate equity swasta semua mendapatkan manfaat. Tangan yang tidak terlihat Adam Smith menyelaraskan investor, arsitek, pembangun, dan pekerja yang menghabiskan bertahun-tahun untuk mempersiapkan properti dalam kondisi yang baik untuk saya dan semua tetangga saya. Kita tidak harus melarang investasi dan investasi institusionil dalam real estate dan sebaliknya harus bersyukur atas apa yang mereka lakukan.
Artikel ini disediakan oleh penyedia konten pihak ketiga. SeaPRwire (https://www.seaprwire.com/) tidak memberikan jaminan atau pernyataan sehubungan dengan hal tersebut.
Sektor: Top Story, Daily News
SeaPRwire menyediakan distribusi siaran pers real-time untuk perusahaan dan lembaga, menjangkau lebih dari 6.500 toko media, 86.000 editor dan jurnalis, dan 3,5 juta desktop profesional di 90 negara. SeaPRwire mendukung distribusi siaran pers dalam bahasa Inggris, Korea, Jepang, Arab, Cina Sederhana, Cina Tradisional, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Melayu, Jerman, Rusia, Prancis, Spanyol, Portugis dan bahasa lainnya.